MOTU #666 and a half
Take a breath. Remove your philosophical cap from its case and fasten the chinstrap.
Grab a pad. Sharpen your pencil.
We have to work this one out. Ready?
Are complete dicks drawn to huge trucks above all other vehicles?
OR
Do huge trucks possess an inherent evil so powerful that they can turn weaker-willed yet otherwise courteous drivers into complete dicks?
January 31st, 2005 at 1:09 pm
It’s not limited to trucks. Big dicks come in all sorts of different vehicles.
January 31st, 2005 at 5:39 pm
When pondering your proposed question, I repeatedly found myself drawn to the age-old debate of nature vs. nurture. In the interest of keeping my comment at a reasonable length, I will refrain from citing my critically acclaimed 2-page Sociology 101 paper discussing this quandry that was undeservedly labeled with a B+ by an over-zealous 24 year old graduate student in the spring semester of my freshman year. To get back to the subject at hand, I find the very idea that an inanimate object could possess an inherent quality that has traditionally been reserved only to describe the emotions and characteristics of human behavior to be profoundly intriguing. On the other hand, the fundamental basis of this argument must be called into question. In summation I’ll just say this: Are complete dicks drawn to huge trucks? Fo’ sho. Skeet skeet skeet skeet.
January 31st, 2005 at 7:58 pm
I have to agree with Dr. Shane. After having done quite a few ethnographic studies myself of the social use of large vehicles in American culture, I noticed that the alpha males were drawn to the larger vehicles. Consequently, these males also had the smallest testicles within the test group.
February 1st, 2005 at 9:42 am
If you live in NM it doesn’t matter. Everyone is a bad driver!